Umesh Kumar Sharma

Department of Radiodiagnosis, B & C Medical College Teaching Hospital and Research Center, Birtamode, Jhapa, Nepal

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2566-2345

Suraj Thapaliya

Department of Radiodiagnosis, B & C Medical College Teaching Hospital and Research Center, Birtamode, Jhapa, Nepal

Abishek Pokhrel

Department of Radiodiagnosis, B & C Medical College Teaching Hospital and Research Center, Birtamode, Jhapa, Nepal

Manmohan Bir Shrestha

Department of Radiodiagnosis, B & C Medical College Teaching Hospital and Research Center, Birtamode, Jhapa, Nepal

Bashu Dev Baskota

Department of Surgery, B & C Medical College Teaching Hospital and Research Center, Birtamode, Jhapa, Nepal

Dinesh Kumar Thapa

Department of Neurosurgery, B & C Medical College Teaching Hospital and Research Center, Birtamode, Jhapa, Nepal

Ujwal Rai

Department of Pathology, B & C Medical College Teaching Hospital and Research Center, Birtamode, Jhapa, Nepal

Keywords : Perianal fistula, MRI

Abstract

Background: Perianal fistula is a troublesome condition both for patient and surgeon with significant morbidity and challenging treatment. MRI is considered as the technique of choice for preoperative evaluation of perianal fistulae, as it provides accurate anatomical information for appropriate surgical treatment, decreasing the incidence of recurrence and allowing side effects such as fecal incontinence to be avoided. The study aimed to describe the role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the diagnosis and classification of perianal fistulae.

Methods: This retrospective study looked at 52 patients referred to the radiology department with a clinical diagnosis of perianal fistula. MRI grading of anal fistula done according to St. James’s University Hospital classification.

Results: The MRI showed 46 internal openings in 44 patients; two patients had more than one. The internal opening was mostly at the 6 o’clock position in 59.9% patients, followed by 7 o’clock and 5 o’clock position in 11.3% of patients. According to the St. James’s University Hospital classification, 21 (47.7%) patients had grade 1, 11 (25%) patients had grade 2, 2 (4.5%) had grade 3, 7 (15.9%) had grade 4, and 4 (9%) had grade 5 fistulae. Twenty-five patients had associated abscesses. The most common location of the abscess was in the perianal region (8 patients).

Conclusions: MR imaging examinations is a highly accurate imaging method for preoperative evaluation perianal fistula. It provides precise information of the fistulous track, along with its relationship to pelvic structures and plays crucial role for surgical planning.